United4Trails
Proposed Revisions

Maintaining the Rule While Addressing Regulatory Burden

The economic case for the current framework, and a revision-based alternative to full repeal.

a mult-use trail system
Multi-use recreation supports local economies

Addressing regulatory burden without scrapping the framework

Trail-based recreation is a significant contributor to local and rural economies. Non-motorized activities — including hiking, tent camping, climbing, and horseback riding — contribute an estimated $10.876 billion in added economic value annually. Motorcycling and ATV use contribute an additional $9.85 billion, for a combined economic impact of roughly $20.725 billion each year.

$10.876BNon-motorized recreation
$9.85BMotorized recreation
$20.725BCombined annual value

These economic impacts depend on trail access, reduced user conflict, and consistent maintenance — all of which are tied to the stability the current designation system provides.

A revision-based approach

Rather than repealing the rule outright, one path under discussion would keep the existing designation framework in place while addressing specific regulatory burdens — including existing Motor Vehicle Use Map decisions, which would remain unchanged under this approach rather than being revisited broadly.

From Our Letter to the USDA Forest Service

The most significant proposed change flips the rule's default: trails addressed in travel plans would be presumed open to motorized use unless specifically designated closed, rather than closed unless designated open. Each national forest would also be required to annually reconsider closed or highly restricted routes for motorized access, but it's unclear whether this includes non-motorized trails, or what happens if a forest can't complete the review due to funding or staffing gaps. Read the full letter →