United4Trails
Proposed Revisions

Maintaining the Rule While Addressing Regulatory Burden

The economic case for the current framework, and a revision-based alternative to full repeal.

a mult-use trail system
Multi-use recreation supports local economies

Addressing regulatory burden without scrapping the framework

Trail-based recreation is a significant contributor to local and rural economies. Non-motorized activities — including hiking, tent camping, climbing, and horseback riding — contribute an estimated $10.876 billion in added economic value annually. Motorcycling and ATV use contribute an additional $9.85 billion, for a combined economic impact of roughly $20.725 billion each year.

$10.876BNon-motorized recreation
$9.85BMotorized recreation
$20.725BCombined annual value

These economic impacts depend on trail access, reduced user conflict, and consistent maintenance — all of which are tied to the stability the current designation system provides.

A revision-based approach

Rather than repealing the rule outright, one path under discussion would keep the existing designation framework in place while addressing specific regulatory burdens — including existing Motor Vehicle Use Map decisions, which would remain unchanged under this approach rather than being revisited broadly.